Thursday, December 17, 2009

Jim DeMint, tea party poster boy, sounds off on gays, marriage, and federalism

Veteran Washington journalist Al Hunt profiles Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina, the darling of the "tea party" movement, and his all-far-right, all-the-time views. DeMint's views on gays reveal both a theocratic view of government and a dangerous ignorance of the constitutional scheme of federalism:

He takes a hard line on social issues — he’s passionately anti-abortion and pro-guns. He has been most outspoken as an opponent of any form of gay marriage.

“Marriage is a religious institution. The federal government has no business redefining what it is,” Mr. DeMint says.

This is one issue where he doesn’t support states’ rights; state government shouldn’t have the right to permit gay marriage.

My comment: I would also add that as long as people are required to purchase a state issued marriage license, and get federal tax benefits, religion is secondary.

“Governments should not be in the business of promoting a behavior that’s proven to be destructive to our society.”

My comment: I would challenge Mr. DeMint to provide any legal proof that same sex marriage has any destructive properties, of any kind, to our society, or in any other capacity.

He cringes at the notion of a gay or lesbian president: “It would be bothersome to me just personally because I consider it immoral.”


You can read the full article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/us/14iht-letter.html?_r=2&scp=10&sq=gay&st=cse/


Thursday, October 15, 2009

A New Study

New Pew data show more Americans support civil unions

CuA new study from the Pew Forum offers a rich collection of data on attitudes toward same-sex marriage and homosexuality more generally. The highlights:

A clear majority of Americans (57%) favors allowing gay and lesbian couples to enter into legal agreements with each other that would give them many of the same rights as married couples, a status commonly known as civil unions. This finding marks a slight uptick in support for civil unions and appears to continue a significant long-term trend since the question was first asked in Pew Research Center surveys in 2003, when support for civil unions stood at 45%.

Over the past year, support for civil unions has grown significantly among those who oppose same-sex marriage (24% in August 2008 to 30% in 2009) while remaining stable among those who favor same-sex marriage. At the same time, opponents of same-sex marriage continue to outnumber supporters overall. An August 2009 Pew Research Center survey finds that 53% oppose allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally, compared with 39% who support same-sex marriage, numbers that are virtually unchanged over the past year.

Supporters of same-sex marriage are divided over the best way to pursue its legalization; 45% favor pushing hard to legalize it as soon as possible, while 42% of same-sex marriage advocates say they should not push too hard to legalize same-sex marriages right away because this might risk creating a backlash against gays and lesbians.

* * *

Nearly half of the public (49%) says homosexual behavior is morally wrong, while 9% say it is morally acceptable and 35% say it is not a moral issue. A similar number says abortion is morally wrong (52%), while far fewer see moral impropriety in divorce (29%) or drinking alcohol (15%).

Blacks are much more likely to think that homosexuality is morally wrong (64%) than whites (48%) or Hispanics (43%). At least half of those ages 30 and older say homosexuality is wrong, compared with fewer than four-in-ten (38%) among those under age 30. And a slim majority of Americans with a high school education or less see homosexual behavior as morally wrong (55%), compared with fewer than half among those with a college degree (40%) or some college education (46%).

Monday, September 21, 2009

Another Interesting Article...

A Memo to the GOP: God Doesn't Choose You to Legislate Discrimination

PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 @ 10:44AM PT

When it comes to Republican politics nowadays, the word "God" is invoked about every fifteen seconds. This weekend, with the Family Research Council's "Value Voters Summit" happening, you can expect that rate to jump drastically. But while it's certainly expected that religion might inform one's politics, only a downright fool would suggest that God chose someone for office so that they could pass anti-gay laws.

Yet that's what's happening in Arizona. Gov. Jan Brewer, who took office earlier this year after former Gov. Janet Napolitano was appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, took a bold anti-LGBT action and decided to repeal all domestic partner benefits for statewide LGBT employees. The move kills domestic partner benefits for about 800 statewide workers, many of them same-sex couples.The Governor followed up her anti-LGBT action with a shot of religious craziness.

"God has placed me in this powerful position as Arizona's governor' to help the state weather its troubles," said Gov. Brewer. Then she goes on to thank the Lord that she lives in a country of Christianity. Because that's in the Constitution....er, wait. No it isn't. We're a country that supposedly celebrates the separation of religion and state.

Not to be outdone by the Governor of Arizona, former Miss California Carrie Prejean strutted into the Values Voter Summit to announce that God chose her to oppose gay marriage on national television. Prejean, celebrating her opposition to same-sex marriage, said about her beauty pageant answer trashing marriage equality, "I’m so proud of the answer that I gave. God chose me for that moment."

Enough already. God is not choosing politicians or former beauty queens to embrace anti-gay platforms, much like God didn't choose George W. Bush to be President and God didn't choose Kanye Westto perform live music before a universe of admirers.

There's a great quote by an American theologian named Reinhard Niebuhr who spoke to the idiocy of people who claim that God is speaking to them to fulfill a political agenda.

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan value and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism," said Niebuhr.

Fanatics. That may be a pretty harsh word. But given the rhetoric of Gov. Jan Brewer and Carrie Prejean, it might just be on point.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Who is the Most Discriminated Group in America?





















Here's an article I found very interesting...



"It's 2009, we have an African-American President, the first Latina Supreme Court Justice, six states have recognized marriage equality, and a female Speaker of the House. That's a pretty impressive line-up, but as the Pew Forum finds, these are the best of times and the worst of times for discrimination.


To be sure, great strides have been made by many groups in the United States. But when it comes

to the issue of who are the most discriminated groups in America in 2009, the survey says: LGBT people and Muslims.


LGBT people, according to the Pew Forum, face the most amount of discrimination in the United States. Their numbers show that 64 percent of the public at large think that gays and lesbians receive heavy doses of discrimination on a day-to-day basis. Muslims come in a close second at 58 percent.


Arsalan Iftikhar at trueslant.com writes that these numbers reflect a change in how society reflects on race and civil rights.

"We can find that both, one, American Muslims and, two, the American LGBT community now currently represent two of the lower societal ‘rungs’ of our current civil rights ‘discrimination totem pole’ today," writes Iftikhar.


Does that gel with where we are as a country nowadays; that LGBT people and Muslims face the brunt of discrimination?


Regardless, surveys like these always reaffirm that more work needs to be done to truly make this a post-racial, post-sexual orientation, post-gender society."


BY MICHAEL A. JONES

CATEGORIES: LGBT AND THE MEDIA, LGBT RIGHTS AND POLITICS, RELIGION AND LGBT RIGHTS

PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 @ 10:29AM PT

http://gayrights.change.org/blog/view/who_is_the_most_discriminated_group_in_america

(Photo courtesy of CarbonNYC's photostream on Flickr.)

Friday, July 10, 2009

New Update

Check this out...

http://gayrights.change.org/blog/view/john_kerry_rips_apart_the_defense_of_marriage_act


Saturday, June 27, 2009

"All I Want for the Holidays by Jonathan Bannon Maher

I found this essay of Facebook, and thought it was worthwhile to share. The author is Johnathan Bannon Maher. Here are his thoughts...

"This essay was sent on December 8th, 2008 through postal mail to each of 535 members of Congress, 9 Supreme Court Justices, 50 governors, the President and the President-Elect, and there after to nearly every member of every state legislature as well as the leadership at the Department of Defense. It was written and sent off the cuff, and I realize there are a few minor errors but have chosen to leave the orignal text intact."

All I Want for the Holidays by Jonathan Bannon Maher

When trade smiths, farmers, teachers and clergy sailed west on boats from Europe with their families in the early 1600s, they sought to leave behind oppression in favor of opportunity and freedom. A century and a half later this vision was recorded in a document, The Declaration of Independence of the United States of America, perhaps best epitomized by the idea captured in the phrase "all men are created equal". Though imperfectly gender specific, it was the first time in the history of humanity that had ever been declared by a governing body. On November 4th of this year, we saw our founders' vision affirmed in the first election of an African American to the highest office of the land, but on the same day, that founding vision fell short in the passage of a law in California to prohibit marriage between loving consenting adults of the same sex.

I am gay, but at 27, marriage is not necessarily the first thing on my mind as I write this. Here is what is on my mind: discriminating between heterosexuals and homosexuals in the law–be it in opportunities for marriage, military service, or through the intentional omission of protections in employment, housing and education–creates a stigma that carries over to the workplace and our public schools, sometimes with devastating consequences.

On February 13th of this year, a 15 year old in Ventura County California, Lawrence King, was shot twice in the head as he sat in his middle school classroom. He was killed by a 14 year old male classmate. According to students in a Newsweek article, he had recently asked that same male classmate to be his valentine.

This is a problem that affects everyone: when a significant percent of the population faces artificial hurdles in achieving their full potential to contribute to society, it works to hold this country back at a time when it faces increasing global competition and challenges to its leadership status.

There are, to my knowledge, three primary reasons that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender equality has not been fully supported in the past:

1) Family. Some believe gay marriage weakens families. In opposing the legalization of gay marriage in California in 2008, reportedly more than 30 million dollars were spent. If the money spent to oppose gay marriage had instead been contributed to family counseling services, it could have provided monthly counseling services to more than 25 thousand at risk families if the cost of a counselor were 100 dollars per hour. Strong families provide stability and resources for children to become the leaders of tomorrow. Strong families are extremely important, but denying equality to gays is not the answer. If the goal of opponents really is strong families, then opposing gay marriage is a misallocation of resources, and let us instead come together, and put resources towards social programs and counseling services that will support and strengthen families.

In addition, there are more than 1 million American children who do not have homes, who do not regularly attend school or receive proper healthcare, and who would be better able to develop into productive members of society if they had homes–even if those homes are non-traditional.

2) Nature. Some believe that homosexuality is unnatural. Around the world, in independent populations, researchers have found a substantially consistent percentage to be same-sex oriented. Over time, homosexuals have been among those who have had the most profound impact on humanity from Socrates to Alexander the Great to Shakespeare. Please remember that the next time you see a copy of Romeo and Juliet or use the Socratic Method. Opposing gays based on nature is like opposing the wind or the sun. You can put up walls but you would be better off putting up wind turbines and solar panels.

3) Religion. Some oppose homosexuality based on religion. "For a man to lie with another man as he would a woman is 'toevah'" (Leviticus 20:13), where toevah is commonly translated as "abomination" or "sin". In that same passage it is also declared toevah to eat shrimp. Toevah literally translates as "against ritual". At the time the Bible was written, people needed to reproduce for the strength of the community – today we have the opposite problem globally, a Malthusian state, where population growth outpaces natural resource replenishment. (Disclosure: the following segment is Jed Bartlet inspired) We are also told that to touch pig skin makes one unclean, that a father may sell his daughter into slavery, and that a person should be put to death for working on the Sabbath (Sabbath is literally translated as "Saturday"). Next time you're watching football on a Sunday, ask yourself if on moral grounds, you should be supporting people who touch pig skin (Leviticus 11:8). If you're someone's daughter, next time you think to oppose homosexuals based on religion, please, ask yourself, "what would a fair price for me be?" (Exodus 21:7). If you answer a work related email on your Blackberry on the Sabbath, ask yourself if law enforcement officials should be legally obligated to stone you to death (Leviticus 23:3).

To those reading this who are heterosexual, in addition to full and equal treatment in every area, including workplace compensation, opportunity and responsibility commensurate with ability, I ask that if you see discrimination in school or in the workplace, remember how discrimination works: they go after you for something else, and if there is nothing else, they'll make something up. If you see this, speak up and out. Please. While you may be alone in your courage you are not alone in your thinking. Others will be with you when you stand on the right side of history. And please redistribute this document.

If you are a heterosexual parent of a homosexual child, please visit your local P-FLAG meeting for support services. You are not alone.

To those reading this who are homosexual, please come out to your friends, then to your family and your employer. There can not be acceptance without understanding. And please redistribute this document.

Henry David Thoreau once wrote, "I know of no more encouraging fact than the unquestionable ability of man to elevate his life through a conscious endeavor." John Kennedy once said "Our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man." If there is anything history has shown, it is that we can progress. That humanity, can progress. That there will be a better tomorrow. One where to the vision this country was founded upon is fully realized; where we, together as a country, once more sail west and leave behind oppression in favor of opportunity and freedom.

Thank you for reading.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Please don't turn your back on us... Part 3


Here’s some interesting updates on the issue of repealing the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) as seen on MSNBC.


Here are the links for reactions from the Rachel Maddow Show...


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#31396563


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#31416719


Here’s what Keith Olberman had to say on the subject...


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#31416031